For Love of Books – Val Kovalin Interview

This is the first interview in 2010 in my continuing series “For Love of Books” and today I’m interviewing Val Kovalin, owner of the wonderful blog Obsidian Bookshelf who also moonlights occasionally as a guest reviewer on this site.

In this series, instead of talking with authors I interview book reviewers, the people who give their opinions about different M/M books and influence the buying patterns of thousands of readers. I wanted the readers to meet the people behind the reviews. Val, like other book reviewers, does this because she loves books and she gives her opinions so that you, the reader, can get a sense of which books are good, bad or downright ugly.

Reviews are always a matter of opinion whether it’s movies, restaurants, stage shows, books, etc., and these opinions can vary from one end of the spectrum to the other, which is why it’s always a good idea to check out several reviews if you have the time, before you put down your hard earned money to buy a book. Most reviewers are motivated by their love of books, are impartial, and if they have any biases they state them upfront, and they don’t expect anything other than “thank you” from the readers.

*********
Hi Val. Thank you for agreeing to my request for an interview.

You’re very welcome. I like this series you’re doing on reviewers. We need all the attention we can get.

Many of the bloggers who come by the site don’t know you very well so I wonder if you could tell us something about Val?

I’m totally what you might expect, in my early 40s and married. My husband and I have been together more than 20 years now. He beta-reads my fiction and tells me if I write anything about men that seems improbable!

I love reviewing because I love to pick apart fiction to see how it works. Trying to write it is even more interesting. In 2008, I wrote an m/m fantasy novel to try out everything I’d soaked up through my reading. I don’t think it’s publishable as is, but I wouldn’t mind recycling parts of it. In 2009, I wrote two m/m paranormal novellas. I’m just now kicking them out the door to meet their eventual destinies.

To have them get accepted by an e-publisher would be very exciting. On the other hand, the lure of self-publishing is very tempting. It might almost be worth the work it would take to have the opportunity to play with all those variables like cover art, distribution, and promotion. It would be a lot of interesting stuff to learn.

How long have you been reviewing and when did you start?

I started about three years ago.

One of your other gigs is with ARe. How did you become associated with All Romance Ebooks and what is your role there?

They recruited me. Their press release reads: “Beginning in early September the Wildfire newsletter will feature five rotating columns … The columnists themselves were carefully chosen for their prior experience as reviewers and their expertise in each genre.”

I’m still surprised and gratified because I’m not that well known a reviewer. The All Romance Ebooks people have been great to work with! I write the column for M/M Gay Romance, and the other four reviewers take a mostly m/f approach to Historical, Contemporary, Multicultural, and Paranormal. It’s been a great opportunity for us reviewers to reach the thousands of subscribers, and the total is growing exponentially. The Wildfire newsletter is emailed at no cost to the subscribers and is full of good content.

Many reviewers have difficulty with some aspects of the job. What do you find most challenging, other than finding the time to read and review the books?

The biggest challenge is probably reader indifference. I’m talking about blog traffic. When it plateaus and I can’t figure out how to raise it, that can be challenging. The www is a meritocracy, which is actually very refreshing, but it can be hard to figure out how to improve and attract more visitors.

You have reviewed a few books for this site and I am always struck by how unusual some of your choices are. How do you decide which books to review?

I look for books that have a strong conflict and three-dimensional characters that care passionately about something. It’s even better if I can get a vivid sense of place, and a detailed insider-look at the characters’ jobs. Even if a book doesn’t strongly attract me, I may buy it anyway because I’m curious about the author, I like the cover art, or because I notice in my blog-traffic reports that people are doing keyword searches on its title.

What do you feel are some of the critical elements of any book review?

A basic review needs a short synopsis that lays out the primary conflict and an opinion, backed by evidence, of whether the book succeeds. Adding other information such as “heat level” or content-warnings can be very helpful.

As a reader, what do you want to know about a book before you make that all important “buy” decision?

Well … if it contains non-consensual sex, nonstop sex, or extreme violence, I’m not going to buy it.

Recently some readers have expressed concern that M/M books seem to be more sex than plot. While some readers like their man on man with lots of sex, others would prefer to have a real story and a romance between the two men rather than portraying them as sex machines. What is your view?

Nonstop sex can be boring – sounds weird, but it’s true! I need plot and character first. Then the sex scenes can be whatever they need to be. Sex scenes can work better than anything to reveal the characters’ personalities and how they interact with each other. Mild to explicit scenes of basic sex are fine with me. In my opinion, if the sexual practices get too outré, they start to compete with the plot and characters for the reader’s attention. This is something I’d notice as a reader, but probably wouldn’t mention in a review unless it was overwhelmingly distracting.

A few times in the recent past reviewers have been verbally attacked on Twitter, Amazon, here, and other sites by authors who don’t like the ratings or reviews of their books. Would it make you less likely to continue reviewing if this happened to you?

I have immense sympathy for the authors because no one else is going to love their books as much as they do. They will always experience a crushing gap between the reaction they expect and the reaction they get. However, I would never attack a reviewer or anybody else, nor would I condone it. Everyone has a right to express his opinion about commercial products, even if the product is someone’s book. If I ever got well known enough to get attacked by authors, I’d ignore them and keep reviewing.

Many reviewers are either frustrated would-be writers or are actually writers themselves. What category do you fall into? If it’s the latter what are some of the challenges for you?

How about frustrated writers-to-be? *snort* I’m just starting to send out my fiction. It can be frustrating, waiting for a response, and then getting a story rejected with no way to know the real reason why. Sometimes editors are generous and provide feedback on a rejection, which I appreciate more than words can say. I never forget a favor like that.

As for challenges of being both a reviewer and a writer, I’ve actually benefited. Tremendously! I’ve become a much more compassionate reviewer, more aware of my tone, and more inclined to help authors with things like putting reviews on Amazon and being generous with those little stars in the rating. I also understand, and don’t take offense over, the mixed feelings that authors have towards us reviewers. We reviewers are like defense attorneys – a necessary evil, but maybe not somebody you’d want to have over for dinner!

On the writing side, it’s a huge advantage to be a reviewer as well as a writer. I don’t take any criticism personally. I’ve seen it all. I’ve even written some of it. When I receive criticism, I sift through it for usefulness and then move on. Nothing short of copyright infringement or plagiarism would make me hold a grudge.

If a reviewer ridiculed my fiction or dismissed it with a one-word review like “Meh …” or “Crap!” it wouldn’t be worth remembering. If a reviewer wrote a huge, analytical piece on why she hated my book, and I disagreed with everything she said (by that, I mean I found nothing in her criticism that I could use), I’d still appreciate her time and effort. We’re talking sincere gratitude. I know how much effort it takes to write a detailed review, and even negative reviews sell books.

What kinds of books do you like reading, other than those you review?

Almost everything, with an equal ratio of fiction to nonfiction. This includes mysteries, science fiction, fantasy, mainstream fiction, the occasional m/f romance, memoirs, psychology, history, and how-to.

Bloggers decide to start a blog for different reasons. If it’s not too personal, could you tell us why Val made this momentous decision? 😀

For fun! I came to the www later than everyone else on the planet. When I finally got here, I saw everyone’s 14 year-old doing a blog and thought that if they could do it, so could I. I wanted to play with stuff like HTML, search engine optimization, and website design.

As for content, I know about books, but didn’t want to get lost in vast genre like Fantasy or Mysteries. M/M Gay Romance was a niche that I could get passionate about. Such a great community, too! Knowledgeable, friendly, and organized. I’ve made some of the best online friendships through M/M Gay Romance.

What does Val do for fun?

This is going to sound hopelessly nerdy, but I like to learn how to do things. This same motive got me into blogging and writing m/m fiction. I get curious about different things and seek instruction – sometimes to the point where I’ll end up teaching it for a while. I’ve done arts and crafts, been a firearms instructor, learned how to lay bricks into a sidewalk, and I’ve dabbled in computer programming. I’d love to learn how to cut hair. I’ve asked my husband if I can practice on him, and the answer is always, “Absolutely not!”

Thank you Val. I appreciate your time.

VAL KOVALIN’S CONTACT INFORMATION

http://obsidianbookshelf.blogspot.com/

23 comments

  • Thanks for the interview. It is good to see what makes Val tick and what not!
    Val keep the good work going 🙂

  • Great interview guys. Hey, since my haircut this week we have the same do Val. 🙂
    *
    I’m always impressed by Val’s reviews because they are so knowledgeable about writing and the different aspects of it. Whereas I’m more of the “that squicked me out, didn’t like it” school of analysis. LOL Her post about different types of stock characters was a fine example and she does that all the time. I’m always blown away. (Although hopefully not literally since she has that firearms training thing going on. 😉
    *
    So thanks for letting us get to know you a bit better Val. Good luck with those stories. Hopefully we’ll be seeing your published work soon.

    • “Hey, since my haircut this week we have the same do Val.”

      *

      Excellent! Don’t you love having short hair? I don’t think I could ever go back to long.

      *

      “Whereas I’m more of the “that squicked me out, didn’t like it” school of analysis.”

      *

      I love your reviews, Tam! They go right to the heart of the story and have this wonderful, dry sense of humor. Your reviews are influencing mine to be more succinct!

      *

      “that firearms training thing”

      *

      Ha, ha! Yes, that was one of the more interesting things I learned. Like everything else, it’s influenced me as a reviewer. I tend to wig out when writers put a “safety” on a revolver. This happens a lot!

      *

      “Good luck with those stories. Hopefully we’ll be seeing your published work soon.”

      *

      Thank you, Tam! Wouldn’t that be fun?

  • Great interview! I love that you singled out “learning to do stuff” as a character trait. I never thought of it that way, but it’s so true. Some people are really resistant to learning things, and other people are like, “Yay, I get to go to a workshop today!” (I’m sure you can tell which camp I think I fall into!)

    • Thanks, Jordan! What a good point you make about learning things. And this, “Yay, I get to go to a workshop today!” Ha, ha! I think you and I may have a lot in common!

  • Great interview. Val is one of my go-to reviewers whenever I think about buying a book, I want to know what she thought of it first.
    *
    I always knew you were writing Val but I can’t wait to read the finished product!

  • Thank you, Kassa! You said, “Val is one of my go-to reviewers whenever I think about buying a book, I want to know what she thought of it first.”

    *

    Wow, this is very flattering, coming from you! I look to your reviews as the gold standard in analytical criticism. You see so many levels about a piece of fiction that I’ll tend to miss, so your reviews are an eye-opener for me!

    *

    “I always knew you were writing Val but I can’t wait to read the finished product!”

    *

    I look forward to inflicting it upon you. 😉 No, really, I’d be thrilled to send you my novellas and get a review. Even if you told me all my mistakes, ha, ha! Especially, actually! Not many reviewers are brave enough to be honestly and analytically critical, but the writers need to know to have any hope of improving.

    *

    Thanks again for the comment, Kassa! 🙂

    • Val you’re quite welcome. It was my pleasure. I don’t think reviewers get enough credit for the time and effort as well as the analytical skills they bring to reviewing.
      *
      >>I also understand, and don’t take offense over, the mixed feelings that authors have towards us reviewers. We reviewers are like defense attorneys – a necessary evil, but maybe not somebody you’d want to have over for dinner!<< * So this means that you won't have us over for dinner when we critique your books.? 😀 * On a serious note, many authors take reviews personally and tend to regard them as attacks, rather than critical analyses of the work to give readers an idea of what to expect between the covers. One of the things I love about the reviewers on this site is that we all try to do a good job without using snark. Maybe some day authors will recognize the difference.

      • “Maybe some day authors will recognize the difference.”

        *

        We can only hope so. There is a big difference.

        *

        “So this means that you won’t have us over for dinner when we critique your books.”

        *

        Ha, ha! Of course I’ll have you all over to dinner. I’ll just seat you at the same table with the defense attorneys. 😉

  • What a great interview, Val, and some very insightful questions, Wave.
    *
    Val, your warmth and generosity just shines through your answers to these questions. I love reading your reviews and have found that we are very similar in our opinions of books, which means I know that if you recommend a book I will probably like it too.
    *
    It was a very interesting point that you made about how being a writer makes you a more compassionate reviewer. I don’t really think I’d thought about that before, and if I had, I probably thought the opposite – that an insider knowledge of writing or, in worst cases, professional jealousy, would lead an author to be harsher than someone who doesn’t write fiction for a living. It shows that actually you care very much about what you do.

    • Thank you, Jen, for the lovely compliments! I’m going to print those out and save them next to my computer. 🙂 That’s just so nice to hear! Also, I’ve noticed that we do have similar tastes in books. I know I definitely get a lot of good ideas on what to read from your reviews!

      *

      You said: ” It shows that actually you care very much about what you do.”

      *

      Thank you so much! 🙂

  • Wonderful interview, ladies! 🙂
    *
    Val, I love reading your reviews. You’ve got a great style about you and they’re informative as well. Great job!
    *
    I’m looking forward to reading your stories as they come out.

  • I’m also a member of the ‘what did Val think of this’ camp. I visit her blog daily and particularly love her discussion topics. They are always so thought-provoking.

    This was a fun opportunity to ‘see’ more of the person behind the icon. Thanks for the great interview! 😀

  • So sorry I’m late, Val. Just wanted to say, keep up the good work!
    *
    When you become a published author, do plan to continue reviewing? If so, do you think your change in status will make it more difficult?

  • Hi, K.Z., and thank you! These are good questions. I notice that a lot of writers start out as reviewers and then discontinue it once they get published. They either want to funnel all their time into writing their fiction, or they feel uncomfortable reviewing their peers as they become published. I can totally understand both of these reasons.

    *

    I still think I’d continue the reviewing. I’d be buying and analyzing the fiction anyway, so I might as well keep on with my blog. It’s sort of a creative outlet for the overwhelming urge to analyze, ha, ha!

    *

    I’ve come a long way with my reviewing and have had a lot of fun with it so I’d be reluctant to stop. I really enjoy interacting with the reviewing community and I think each reviewer out there is helping our m/m genre, and I wouldn’t want to take away my support from that.

    *

    So, at most, I think I’d slow down my review output somewhat (and only if I absolutely had to), but I’d keep on with both the fiction writing and the reviewing. Good questions! Thanks again. 🙂

  • Great interview! Val is one of my favorites in the community and it’s great to get to know more about her.

    Val, keep up the great work, you (and your blog) are a great asset to us.

Comments are closed.