Regardless of the other posts, funny or serious, this is a review site and I take your temperature from time to time to see if we’re giving you what you want.
Unless this is your first visit to the site most bloggers know that our reviews are pretty long. We cover characterization, plot, dialogue/prose, pacing (sometimes), what worked and what didn’t. As readers (and this includes authors because they are readers too), I’m assuming that you check out our reviews ( and those on other sites) because you’re trying to decide if you should buy a particular book, and not because you like our prose and dialogue. :). So the question is – are we giving you what you need to make that all important “buy” decision?
Leslie pulled the numbers together a couple of weeks ago and we had reviewed about 170 books during the first 3 months of this year, but for me quality is more important than quantity. So in this vein, have we met your needs?
Is the content what you’re looking for?
Do you like the plot synopsis in the reviews or would rather we mostly eliminate it? *(We can’t delete it altogether but we could reduce it). 🙂
What elements would you like us to change? Be specific.
How can we improve our reviews? Be specific.
What do you want more or less of?
Would you like shorter reviews (like those on most other sites)?
Are there specific types of M/M books that we currently don’t review which you would like us to review?
What did I forget? (Sorry, this is not the place to ask for a hot guy even though today is Friday) 🙂
Tell us what you want and we would be happy to try and give him (sorry, I meant ‘it’) to you 🙂
Umm. They’re good. LOL I’m not fussy, long, short, whatever. I get a sense of the book thew way you are doing it now. Sometimes I like long ones, probably more so on books that I’ve read because I’m always curious if how I felt about a book matches up with someone else and a long one lets me get a more indepth opinion of the book.
If I’m reading it to see if it will be a must-buy for me vs a pass, then probably short could do just as much but that’s in part because I’ve been slinking around here so long I know the reviewers and whose taste will most match mine. Likely if Jen just wrote a 4 word review and said “It’s good read it.” that would be enough for me. I know what she considers good and how that matches up with what I consider good. But obviously people who don’t know the reviewers and haven’t been able to correlate their own tastes with the reviewers here, need more than that to base their decisions on.
So for me they are fine as they are, but I’m not averse to change if some reviewers wanted to go shorter or use a different style that’s okay too.
Oh and I think you guys cover every genre and type of m/m that I can think of. It’s easy to say “oh I wish there were more m/m fantasy reviews” but if there aren’t that many m/m fantasy books coming out (I know you guys mostly reviewer newer books) then you can’t really make stuff up. (BTW, fantasy is not really my thing, I just threw it out there.) I suppose you could review older books but to be honest I’m mostly a contemporary/mystery/paranormal reader and those are the majority of books out there I think, thus I get my fill of reviews. But I’m sure other readers have different faves.
Hi Tam
I was going to ask you to be a reviewer on the site, but I knew you would refuse. 🙂
As you say, very short reviews would work if you know the reviewer and had similar tastes, but with so many readers logging on to the site they might not be as forgiving.
So you only trust Jen’s reviews. What about me? Have I ever steered you wrong? (Don’t answer that) What about my money back guarantees that you never had to cash in? 🙂
You’re right about different themes in M/M romances – sometimes there are just not enough new steampunk books to review. 🙂
No no no. LOL I actually know all of the reviewers here now and know whose taste best matches mine. Jen was just an example. Actually to be honest a lot of the reviewers here have similar opinions on books to mine and often those that are different are because of genre differences. I’m not a fan of historicals or fantasy (as opposed to sci-fi) so someone may rave about a fantasy book but I’ve learned the genre isn’t to my taste.
So no playing favourites. I love ya all.
An no, no reviews for me, not formal ones, not my style.
Personally, I like the long reviews that give me as much information as possible to make a decision on buying a book. What you didn’t mention, and what is a definite hook for me, is the reviewer’s enthusiasm toward a specific story. Yes, the plot is there, and yes, the book is well described, but in reading between the lines I sometimes see a barely concealed, “Wow! I was blown away!” or a “Yawn! Now where was I?”
Long, short, whatever, it’s the reviewers here that keep me coming back. I may not be able to put my finger on the exact reason, I just know that there is information here that I can trust and use for purchasing decisions.
Keep up the good work.
Hi Winn
>>Long, short, whatever, it’s the reviewers here that keep me coming back. I may not be able to put my finger on the exact reason, I just know that there is information here that I can trust and use for purchasing decisions<< Thanks for the vote of confidence. We try to give readers as much information as possible to help them on their "buy" decisions. Recently I didn't expdect to like MORE by Sloan Parker as much as I did because I hate M/M/M romances that are all about sex, but even though this one had a lot of sex I loved the characters and I guess my enthusiasm showed. 🙂 We will try to be more gung ho in the future.
Great topic, Wave. I’ll be checking back for people’s feedback, no question. 🙂 I’ve been struggling with this myself on my own site because writing the long ones can be hideously time-consuming, and yet I have to admit that I really don’t have “the touch” to write good short ones. They come across too shallow when I try to write short ones.
I like the length of the ones on this site. I like the blurb + review structure. I don’t think I’d change anything here except possibly to add a little “quick summary” line for those who are in a rush and don’t want to read the long reaction? That way you have the best of both worlds in the same review: long version + a short summary line (like one sentence) that serves the same evaluative purpose as the number rating but adds a little explanation.
Hi Val
From time to time I ask the readers how they like what we’re doing. I haven’t done that lately – this is just a subset of a much longer feedback process.
I hope that the comments will help you reshape elements of your reviews if you think that’s necessary.
I have experimented from time to time with a sentence right at the beginning of the review that gives an assessment of the book and maybe we should make it a permanent feature as you suggest.
On principle I don’t like short one paragraph reviews because they don’t tell me enough about the elements of a book that I consider important so, even though I’m now aiming for my reviews to come in under 1000 words which includes the blurb, there are times when I go over.
Thanks Val.
I love the length of the reviews here. I agree with Winn that the longer reviews give you an insight to what the review’s actually feeling about the book. I agree with Tam also because the longer reviews allow you to set up a trust connection, so that if you don’t have time to read the review, then just knowing that that reviewer gave the book 5 stars automatically puts it on your to buy list. In this situation, the summary sentence review would work great as well. If I don’t know the reviewer or have read any of their longer reviews, I really don’t like the reviews that say ‘I loved this book, it’s great!’ or ‘I hated this book, it’s crap.’ without explaining why since taste is so subjective. I need to know why you think it’s great or why it’s crap until I know that I can trust your judgment. Even then, if someone gives it a less than stellar review (no matter the length), I will look up one or two other reviews just to see what they say before I give up on a book.
The only other type of review I can think of that I’d like to see is steampunk, but if it’s not written yet, you can’t review it (so get cracking you steampunk writers!). I can’t think of anything else you need to change…you’re doing great!
Hi CountrygirlXXOO
Thanks for commenting.
The only author I’m aware of right now who is writing a steampunk romance is Sean Kennedy, sorry. Although I do believe that it’s catching on so maybe there will be more books along this theme.
Liking the same type of books that a particular reviewer also likes goes a long way to establishing a trust connection with a reader. Hopefully there are enough reviewers on this site to give readers a choice.
I’m glad you like the length of our reviews. We would have hated to change that since I think our approach is a good one.
I have been reading/lurking on your site from almost the beginning, found you thru a link from TA Chase’s blog (his first interview). I know you want us lurkers to come out and be more interactive so this survey is my first ever post to any site.
I have definite tastes with favorite authors, a review of these would not influence my buying them or not. I am interested in new authors, this is where your longer review format helps out. I’m often uneasy about the quality and safety of the newer, smaller e-pubs or self-pub sites where some of these writers can be found. But I understand the author’s percentage of sale is greater when buying from the original publisher?
You’re longer and more detailed reviews give me the story details about POV and characterization that I want when I’m curious about a new author. I hated TSL heroines when I read m/f fiction and it is the same for my m/m heroes. Really bad editing, formatting, and a hard to navigate site will be a factor in my buying choices. The explosion of new authors and sites can be confusing and intimidating. Your site’s reviews can help me make more informed choices.
Finally, I truly love the civil, friendly tone of all your reviewers and regular followers. Those follow up comments often add greatly to the total review. I hope this never changes.
Hi Jill
>>Finally, I truly love the civil, friendly tone of all your reviewers and regular followers. Those follow up comments often add greatly to the total review. I hope this never changes.<< We love comments like this because we strive to be open and not take offence when a reader disagrees with a review. No plans to change this. >>You’re longer and more detailed reviews give me the story details about POV and characterization that I want when I’m curious about a new author.<< We'll try to be more detailed about books by new authors. There are a couple of publishers whose books I no longer buy to review because their policies are suspect. BTW buying from the publisher means that the author gets more royalties than buying from sites like ARe and amazon. Thanks for commenting Jill. I really appreciate your observations.
Don’t change anything! I love the synopsis part, because quite often a reviewer will emphasize completely different events to the blurb and show up how misleading the blurb is. And I like how the reviews don’t let writers off with niggledy bits and bad writing, even if they like the story. So there’s no need to change anything as far as I’m concerned.
Hi Alexi
Glad you approve and thanks for the vote of confidence. 🙂 We try to show that even though we like a book that doesn’t mean that we let the authors or publishers off the hook for sloppy editing or poor spelling.
I like your longer reviews – that’s the thing that hooked me in the first place. The only thing that comes to mind is this – when introducing the new authors, maybe the reviewers can say: if you liked the themes in X, than you’ll like Y or if you liked the style of W, than you’ll like Z – just so we can have better idea what to expect. Overall, I like how things are done here and I wouldn’t change a thing.
Lady M
I think I understand what you mean about giving some tips and comparisons to other well known authors when we review new authors. However a few reviewers (e.g. Jenre and Leslie ) have only been reading contemporary M/M for about a year and may not know the ‘older’ and more established M/M authors. The themes might be easier to do.
The reviews on this side are actually the most helpful ones I know, particularly because they are detailed. I like the long synopsis parts.
Sometimes, though, I miss the reviewer’s personal feelings about the book reviewed. Don’t get me wrong, a review is always expression of one’s personal opinion. But especially when a book doesn’t work for the reviewer, I like to know exactly why. A few times there were those double reviews, one book reviewed by two people. I liked that very much.
But overall, I love this site and the reviews as they are. There’s a reason I visit this site almost every day (although mostly “lurking”)
😉
Hi Feliz
When you say you miss our personal feelings about a book I thought that when we said a book didn’t work for us that we mentioned why in the review. I’ll make a point of your comment.
I love the dueling reviews too but because there are so many books that we have to review we are always behind and don’t have enough time to do so. Maybe we could select one book every 3 months by a new author to have a dueling review.
I like the way things are. A two line review would not work for me. Some things that won’t work for reviewers do work for me. So I like that reviewers put those things in.
Like editing mistakes don’t bother me, I would read first drafts as long as I am reading something! (anyone out there looking for a beta reader?? :)).
Keep on reviewing new authors, I know what the usual suspects do but I am sometimes not sure about new ones.
Hi Ingrid
Maybe I should have an inventory of beta readers. 🙂 We talked about that 9 months ago when a number of authors said that they didn’t know how to write minority characters.
We’re trying to find new authors to review and will continue to search them out. I have a couple of them on my ‘review’ list right now.
Your site is usually the deciding factor if I’m waffling about whether to buy a book or not. IMO, I need the blurb and the longer review and it’s good to know what works for a reviewer and what doesn’t……it may not be the same issue/s for me but at least I know about them.
I would like to see reviews of some of the older books, though. I’m a semi-recent fan of m/m stories (I think Kate Pearce was my first foray into a story with any m/m action) but I’m an addict now (hello, my name is Sherry and I read m/m stories). So, anyway, I know it has to be time consuming but I’m sure there are a lot of good older books out there that “we’re” just afraid to take the plunge and buy cuz we don’t see it on your site! 🙂
Regardless, you and your reviewers do a fabulous job and I’m in here every day – and I stopped lurking awhile ago and started to add my 2 cents worth! Thanks to you and the others for all your time and hard work!
Hi Sherry
Since this seems like a refrain, I will do my best to post more reviews of old favourites. There are already some on the site but they are not exactly identified as “old favourites” on the sidebar. We’ll try to have a new category for these books when we change over to WordPress 3.0 if not before.
>>Regardless, you and your reviewers do a fabulous job and I’m in here every day – and I stopped lurking awhile ago and started to add my 2 cents worth! Thanks to you and the others for all your time and hard work!<< The reviewers thank you for this. We work hard on your behalf and it's nice to be appreciated. 🙂
I think you do a pretty good job, here! 🙂
I’d echo Valkovalin’s comment about a summary line – I like that even if I’m going to read the whole review.
Hi Amy
We will try to insert a summary line in future reviews. This might take a week or two because some reviews are already written and awaiting their scheduled posting dates.
Hi Wave,
I wouldn’t change anything. I use your site as one of my main sources of what M/M books to buy and read. I think you have developed a good way of reviewing. I like the synopsis and then the reviewer’s comments and thoughts. What really impresses me is that the reviewers are always kind, even when they clearly did not enjoy the reading experience.
I agree with LadyM that a comparison to another author or theme would be helpful if possible, but I have found that the highly rated books are generally ones that I like as well. Granted you have to discern if the book is the “type” of book that you enjoy, i.e. character driven, sweet romance, M/M/M, BDSM, etc.
Thanks again for such a great site!
Hi TJ
It’s great to hear that you enjoy the site. We try to please 🙂
>>What really impresses me is that the reviewers are always kind, even when they clearly did not enjoy the reading experience.<< Sometimes that's hard but we recognize that writing is really tough. Many reviewers are frustrated writers. :) >>Granted you have to discern if the book is the “type” of book that you enjoy, i.e. character driven, sweet romance, M/M/M, BDSM, etc.<< We try to identify those themes wherever we can because you don't want to read a BDSM book when you're looking for a sweet romance. Thanks for commenting TJ and let me know if you're trying to find a book and the system is uncooperative.
I am new to published M/M stories, and since I’m literally swamped (not to mention astounded) by the amount of books out there for purchase, I felt like I hit a goldmine when I found your review site. I know that M/M stories fill a niche market, but there are still plots and writing style to consider. Your reviews helped me immensely on choosing what books to read and where to start. The sheer volume of works and the number of publishers are daunting to say the least.
I started digging through your 5 stars and 5* rating reviews and I never looked back. Through those reviews, I’ve become enamored with so many wonderful writers such as K. A. Mitchell, Josh Lanyon, Charlie Lochrane, etc, and I branched off to read their entire lines of work.
I thoroughly enjoy your reviews because you’re straightforward and you cut to the chase with what you like and dislike. For example, your review of Caught Running was honest and you remarked on the jumping POVs. Even though you marked that book quite high (and I’ve read other reviews on it), I don’t think I can read a book with shifting POVs. These are little things I really enjoy about your reviews.
The only thing I’d ask for is…perhaps you’d consider pinning a post of all the authors somewhere for easy browsing?
Otherwise, thanks so much for the reviews!
Hi KLG
WordPress ate my previous response so I’ll do this again.
Using the 5 stars or 5+ stars as a guide is an excellent start. I should point out that Kassa and Kris don’t believe in handing out a lot of 5 stars so you might want to check the 4.5 and 4.75 stars as well.
Re a list of authors, if you check the right hand sidebar below MUSIC you’ll find AUTHORS. Clicking on any letter of the alphabet brings up the full list of authors whose books have been reviewed on the site. If you click on their name (s) the books should be in the next window. Let me know if this works for you or if I misunderstood your comment.
Thanks so much for dropping by.
I’m working my way backwards to the 4.75 and 4.5 stars. It’s taking me a while to get there due to limited reading time.
Also, I forgot to mention in my earlier comment that I really enjoy the length of the reviews. If you can break it down into something like: summary, characters, writing style, I wouldn’t be upset. I always search for similar style authors, for example: if you like X, you may also like Y in terms of plot, or if you like X’s writing style, you may want to try Z’s books.
I can’t believe I completely overlooked the A-Z listing! Thanks for pointing it out; incidentally, I saw the name of the authors, but they brought me to their respective websites.
It may seem weird to some people but I rarely read most of the reviews til after I’ve at least made my decision about a book. Sometimes not til after I’ve read a book. I might look at a review long enough to see what they rated it(meaning the 1-5 that a lot of reviews use)but that’s it. I base my buying decision on the blurb and sometimes the excerpt.
I do like seeing others opinions, but only after I have formed my own first.
Everybody’s tastes are different and a book I love may not appeal to others, and the reverse is also true.
Beth
There are a few readers like you – one is thelastaerie. 🙂 She always checks out the reviews after she has read the book and we discuss where we agree or differ. Strangely, most of the time we agree.
I understand when a reader doesn’t want to spoil the reading ‘experience’ by checking out reviews beforehand.
Hi Wave,
First, this is my favorite review site. My biggest frustration is that I have to “click” to read the review – I’d like to at least see the summary line in the teaser before I have to click. Otherwise, I am happy with the length and detail. By the way, I don’t want each reviewer to “sound” or be the same – what’s the point! On another note, I agree with Sherry F in that it would be great to see reviews for some older things that are on the top 200 (300) list that haven’t been reviewed recently. I am relatively new to this genre, but read fast – so at first there was a lot to choose from – now I sometimes run out… So, insights into some older things would be good. I just read Three Fortunes in One Cookie (or something like that from the list) and really enjoyed it. I would never have found that book without you.
Hi Christa
Thanks for your comment. You raise an interesting point by suggesting that we summarize the review in the first sentence and that the ‘cut’ line should be after that summary sentence. Great suggestion.
Re reviews of older books, some of the reviewers haven’t been reading M/M for that long – probably Lynn, Lily and I have been reading these books the longest. I’m not sure about Kassa, Val and Kris but I know that Leslie and Jenre are recent converts. However I did promise sometime ago to review my old favourites and some of these reviews are on the site, but and I will make a concerted effort to do so at least every two weeks. The number of new books being released every week that we have to review is horrendous so there’s not as much time for older books but I will try. If there are any older books that you would like to see reviewed please email me at jessewave@gmail.com.
I love to read reviews after I`ve read the books.
I`m happy when a beloved book gets a high rating-I`m grumpy when the rating is low and the other way around.(There must be a reason why a 1-star rating gets as many (much?)responses as a 5-star rating!)
That`s entertainment-*g*.
Leslies (very emotional) review of Take My Picture was an absolute highlight for me and I love your reviews of the “oldies”.
Everything`s perfect ! -Leave it as it is.
Sure,there could be more reviews…………
?? A part of my comment has disappeared.
New try:
Exceptions are new authors and publishers.I`ve learned that in this cases it`s better(and cheaper)to wait for the reviews.I look at the rating and the summary at the end of the review and then I decide if I buy and read the book.When I´m finished with the book I read the whole review.
Hi Simsala
I’m glad that at least we help you decide on purchases with the newer authors. 🙂
>>I`m happy when a beloved book gets a high rating-I`m grumpy when the rating is low and the other way around.(There must be a reason why a 1-star rating gets as many (much?)responses as a 5-star rating!)
That`s entertainment<< As you know, reading is one of those areas where personal taste matters a lot. As for the 1 star reviews, they are very rare on this site fortunately. 🙂
I am not sure I’m a recent convert. I’ve been reading m/m pretty exclusively since 2006–I just didn’t have a place to post reviews of the contemporary stories, which is why I was thrilled when Wave took me on as a guest reviewer last September. Thanks again, Wave.
I enjoy the classics and have posted reviews of a few here. In fact, I have one lined up to post in the next few days. If folks have suggestions for other “oldies” let Wave know. I would be happy to read and review more of them.
Thanks for all these comments, too, which is very helpful. I am always very appreciative of reader feedback.
L
Hi Leslie
I always had the impression that you were a recent convert to M/M because you didn’t know many of the older books that had been popular for some time. Sorry my error. Maybe you meant the classics and I was thinking more recent favourites say 5 – 10 years ago. In any event I’m glad that’s cleared up.
Hm, there isn’t much to add. I like the reviews very much the way they are. They’re always insightful and detailed without being spoilerish and that translates to very good advice wether to spend my money or not. 🙂
I especially like reviews with a personal touch – it’s nice to know if and why a book just knocked the socks off the reviewer. So a bit of gushing is fine for me. Although I’m not sure to which extent you can provide this kind of insight within the frame of a “formal/professional” review.
Keep up the great work and thanks for all the reviews! 🙂
Lilli
thanks for the vote of confidence. We all appreciate knowing that readers like what we do because reviewing is really tough.
>>I especially like reviews with a personal touch – it’s nice to know if and why a book just knocked the socks off the reviewer<< Sometimes we do take off the reviewer 'hat' and let our enthusiasm peek through, but you're right, we have to maintain decorum most of the time. 🙂
I love the reviews and articles (though I admit, I skim those if the topic doesn’t interest me). It’s tough to keep up with all the reviews. 😉 I wouldn’t change much, if anything!
If the blurb has a lot of detail, sometimes the synopsis is a bit redundant and could be trimmed. This may be uncommon (i.e., I haven’t noticed it enough to get frustrated).
Rarely, a book with no real flaws is rated 4 stars, or one with only a few minor flaws is rated 3 stars. This confuses me. Sometimes it’s probably my poor reading comprehension, but sometimes I read it 2 or 3 times and figure the reviewer’s leaving something out. Even reading “meh, nothing wrong with it–just didn’t really ‘wow’ me” would help. Again, this is RARE! Usually y’all are GREAT at explaining why a book with no major flaws didn’t get a higher rating, and I appreciate that. 🙂
Unless I can’t find a review here, I don’t read other M/M review sites. 😉 Y’all do so many reviews, it’s almost one-stop-shopping. I only look elsewhere if I run across an intriguing-sounding book and there’s no review here.
ROCK ON!
Hi Kendall
Thanks for the comments.
>>Rarely, a book with no real flaws is rated 4 stars, or one with only a few minor flaws is rated 3 stars. This confuses me. Even reading “meh, nothing wrong with it–just didn’t really ‘wow’ me” would help. Again, this is RARE!<< Sometimes this is because individual reviewers rate differently. For example, Kassa and Kris are the toughest reviewers so their 3 stars or 3.5 stars could be another reviewer's 4 stars. As you get to know each reviewer's personal rating style and taste it becomes easier to figure out (I think). I and a couple of other reviewers are probably on the other end of the spectrum although that's a generalization. >>If the blurb has a lot of detail, sometimes the synopsis is a bit redundant and could be trimmed. This may be uncommon (i.e., I haven’t noticed it enough to get frustrated).<< As blurbs get longer we will obviously cut the synopsis, however on many occasions the reviewer's synopsis has nothing to do with the blurbs because on many occasions the blurbs bear no relationship to the story. But we will try to reduce the synopsis if the blurbs are accurate representations of what's in the books. >>Unless I can’t find a review here, I don’t read other M/M review sites. Y’all do so many reviews, it’s almost one-stop-shopping.<< Thank you Kendall. We appreciate readers like you. 🙂
Thanks for ‘splaining. I’m not good at tracking review styles, etc.–which is silly because I try to pay attention to who writes each review I read. I’m a flake….
What I like best about the reviews here is that, in general, your reviewers explain WHY a book did or didn’t work for them as a reader. I have a very strong sense of what I like and don’t like, so I want to know WHY the reviewer liked it, so I can make my own determination. A review that just says “it was great-4 stars-buy it” is worthless.
I like that the reviewers often include information on any “niggles” they had (eg, typos, squick factors, pov shifts, annoying nicknames, incorrect information, etc.).
>>Do you like the plot synopsis in the reviews?<<
YES!! I often see books here first and I want to know what they are about without having to click through all the time to the various publishers unless I'm interested in buying.
Hi SCSPAINE
Thanks for letting us know what worked for you as a reader.
>>Do you like the plot synopsis in the reviews?<< "YES!! I often see books here first and I want to know what they are about without having to click through all the time to the various publishers unless I'm interested in buying." One of the reasons we include the plot synopsis is that most blurbs don't explain what the story is about or they are misleading, so I'm happy you like how we structure the reviews. Also you like that we tell you WHY a book didn't work for us. As you said, the reason why a reviewer didn't like a particular book might be the same reason you would want to read it. Different strokes. 🙂
I think that every review I have read (read: all) at Wave has given me exactly what I need to know about the book and characters and author. No matter who reviews the book, there is a thoroughness that I appreciate. It may have something to do with the fact that each reviewer seems to know what “I” need to know to entice me to read a book lol! You all are doing a great job in my opinion, and *trying not to sound like a suck up* I don’t really read any other review sites cause I find what I need/want right here!
Elaine
>> You all are doing a great job in my opinion, and *trying not to sound like a suck up* I don’t really read any other review sites cause I find what I need/want right here!<< We love the last bit (even though we tell all the readers to check out other review sites we love it when you like what we say).
I’m commenting late, but I appreciate all the comments about the reviews, though no one mentioned me specifically. pout….grin I model my reviews after the reviewers here before me. And I probably am easier on books I like and harder on those that I don’t. I have only reviewed 3 so far, but I’m confident I’ll get better.
Thanks again for the opportunity, Wave.
Hi John
>>I appreciate all the comments about the reviews, though no one mentioned me specifically. pout<< You have to give the readers the opportunity to know you like I do. On second thoughts that won't work either. 🙂 You're doing fantastic - I just wish you had more time to review more books but I know that farming must come first.