Title: This Rough Magic
Author: Josh Lanyon
Cover Artist: April Martinez
Publisher: LooseId
Length: Short Novel
Genre: Mystery, historical fiction (1930s)
Rating: 4.75 stars out of 5
A dueling guest review by Leslie
In a nutshell: Vintage Lanyon: what Josh does best. A clever mystery with lovely writing and a pair of very likeable protagonists.
The Blurb:
Wealthy San Francisco playboy Brett Sheridan thinks he knows the score when he hires tough guy private eye Neil Patrick Rafferty to find a priceless stolen folio of Shakespeare’s The Tempest. Brett’s convinced his partner-in-crime sister is behind the theft—a theft that’s liable to bring more scandal to their eccentric family, and cost Brett his marriage to society heiress Juliet Lennox. What Brett doesn’t count on is the instant and powerful attraction that flares between him and Rafferty.
Once before, Brett took a chance on loving a man, only to find himself betrayed and broken. This time around there’s too much at risk. But as the Bard himself would say, Journey’s end in lovers meeting.
The Review:
Sometimes you just want to put on your comfiest tee-shirt and well-worn flannel pants, curl up on the couch with a really good book and immerse yourself in the story. A story that is as cozy as the shirt and pants. Josh Lanyon does that for me and This Rough Magic, his latest, was a really comfy read. I loved it!
Josh covers some familiar territory in this story: a California setting (San Francisco, beautifully described); a clever mystery; a rare and valuable literary manuscript (The Tempest by Shakespeare); signature flourishes including martinis and a funny animal (this time, a monkey) but most importantly, the main characters. Two gay men, one who knows he is and is okay with it (but realizes the need to be discreet and private) and the other who knows he is but wishes he wasn’t. Can we say Adrien and Jake, anyone? Nathan and Mathew? In this case it’s Neil Patrick Rafferty, former cop turned PI and Brett Sheridan, son of the very high-society Sheridans and the man on whom all his family’s hopes are pinned.
The story takes place in the 1930s at a time when “society” was perhaps a bit more important than it is today. At least it is very important to the Sheridans, a family that is adverse to scandal but hiding lots of scandalous secrets, including the fact that they’re broke. It’s fallen to Brett to save the family fortunes and honor. He’s accomplished the former in dribs and drabs by surreptitiously selling off precious family artifacts and his own polo ponies but he’s come to realize the only way he’ll truly secure the family fortune—and honor—is to marry a wealthy young woman. In this case that woman is Juliet Lennox, nouveau riche heiress to a meatpacking fortune. It is a prospect that does not make Brett happy.
The story opens with Brett hiring Rafferty to locate and return a very valuable folio—The Tempest, by Shakespeare—that is owned by his father-in-law and stolen right under everybody’s noses during Brett and Juliet’s engagement party. Brett has suspicions that his sister might be involved, supposedly because she has recently taken up with a small-time crook, Harry Sader. Rafferty takes this all in, asks for and receives a hefty fee, and the mystery is afoot.
As I said above, there was a great deal of Lanyon familiarity in this story, with echoes of the the Adrien English mysteries as well as Snowball in Hell. Some might criticize the author for becoming formulaic; I, instead, see it as a strength. To me, there’s nothing wrong with being a reliable, dependable author, especially in the mystery genre. From the very first page when I cracked this open, I felt like I was settling down for a conversation with an old friend. As the story unfolded, Lanyon didn’t disappoint. I was completely engrossed, enjoying the evocative imagery and lovely writing all the way to the very last sentence.
As for the mystery? It was clever and fun and I didn’t figure it out until the very end—but then, I never do. The clues were there, though, for readers who are perhaps better detectives than me.
I really liked the protagonists, Brett and Rafferty (or Neil, as Brett eventually comes to think of him—another Lanyon trademark signaling a shift in their relationship). Brett is a young man who wants to do the right thing and keep everybody happy, often at the expense of his own feelings and needs. Rafferty is the “hardboiled detective” who turns out to be not all that hardboiled. In Brett’s words,
“There it was again, that unexpected and somehow terrifying gentleness. So much better, so much easier, if Neil had simply been the hardboiled tough he’d seemed at first glance, because this…”
Later, he thinks,
“He lifted his lashes and was surprised by an expression on Neil’s face that he knew Neil would not want him to see. He closed his eyes again, giving Neil time to rearrange his features into the usual rock formation.”
As with so many Lanyon couples, I wanted them to find a way to be together. That desire started from their very first meeting and wended its way through the book. Even more telling, I wished I could meet them—another after-effect I often experience with Josh’s characters! Maybe someday we’ll all get to party together…LOL.
My only minor quibble (aside from the cover, which does nothing for me, but I know that’s not Josh’s issue) is that this is the first of a proposed series (A Shot in the Dark, #1). As such, it does feel like there are a number of loose ends, threads that I am sure will be pulled through in future installments. Still, what’s up with Justine and her little black book? Kitty and Harry? Crazy Aunt Lenora? I realize that some of these plot elements were thrown in as red herrings to divert readers from figuring out who the perpetrator of the theft was; still, at the end, there were a couple of niggle questions in my mind about details that didn’t get quite sewn up.
But as I said, that’s a minor point. All in all, this was a wonderful book for a rainy Sunday afternoon, transporting me far away to another time and place. I love writers who can do that. For me, Josh has succeeded, once again
Highly recommended.


















Ah, I much more agree with your take on this book. I thought it was a good book and a great foundation for things to come. 😀
Thanks for your comment. I really enjoyed it too (obviously!). I look forward to reading about Brett and Neil again.
L
ok this is interesting- I just posted a comment on the other review of this book – both the reviews were good – thank you but I think that your rating is closer to the mark.
What Minnie said! 🙂
Leslie, your review resonates how I feel about this story. In a nutshell, I was up late into the night reading and saying out loud to myself “I love Josh’s writing” many times. 😀
Always look forward to more from him.
I love this book also! I have no knowledge of what classic noir or 1930s mean, lol, so my expectation is great characters, great plot, and great romance, and I got them all.
And perhaps I am one of the few people who can’t enjoy pure noir movies/ stories. I am glad this books is not too “noir”. I can’t relate with the setting at all. The reference will be lost on me.
Thanks for your comments, everyone.
This really shows how interesting this “duelling review” idea is and how people can see a book so differently. I think Jeff’s review is very interesting but his take is obviously not mine–partly because I don’t know as much about “noir 30s” detective stories. I think I’ve seen one Nick and Nora movie in my life! For me, my frame of reference was much more about Josh and what he has written in the past vs. comparing to something else. Both are legitimate approaches which makes these two reviews interesting to compare and contrast –and ultimately make up your mind whether or not you want to read the book.
L
Leslie
Aren’t these duelling reviews wonderful? We haven’t ahd one in ages and it’s always great to see what different readers think of a book.
I can see both perspectives — I understand where Jeff is coming from because I have seen a few “noir 30’s” detective stories. I also know and appreciate your particular perspective. It all depends on one’s background, frame of mind and the author’s eloquence and ability to envelop the reader in his world.
I have to do this again because it’s so much fun for the other readers.
Thank you Leslie.
I can’t really give a comment because I haven’t read this one yet. I do however agree with you Leslie. I love Josh and what gems he writes. I could read medicore, horrible and fabulous reviews and still buy it because he is one of my favorite authors across all genres! 🙂
“I felt like I was settling down for a conversation with an old friend.”
Exactly Leslie! As you did, I really enjoyed TRM. It has all the elements that I love about Josh Lanyon’s work; well drawn characters, interesting plot, solid writing and most of all wonderful and at times very clever dialog. Well done review. Thanks Leslie!
Thanks, Leslie, for the review. I just love the dueling reviews!
Josh is an auto-buy author for me and I can’t see that changing any time soon. However, this one was not one of his best stories, IMO. Maybe, this is the “new series syndrome” where we didn’t quite adopted the new characters. I’m inclined to agree with the part of Jeff’s review, where he said that the characters weren’t entirely focused. I also agree with Saga (you can read her comment there) – the beginning was sooooo awesome and then things just fell flat. The entire wild goose chase to Reno irritated me. I see why Josh did it, but it took too much space and made the resolution of this mystery rushed and less interesting than it should have been. Now that Josh has several story lines started in this story, maybe the next one will be more focused. Of course, I’ll read it! It’s Josh after all. 🙂
Thanks for the review. I like the dueling reviews as well. What a great way to mix things up!
I half-heartedley read the blurb for this book, mainly bought because it was a JL book. While reading, I was trying to picture the background,time frame of the story and creating a current time and failing, because inevitably I kept finding myself in the 30’s and 40’s. I made a concerted effort to go back and read the blurb and realized that yes, that is where the story is originating. I enjoyed it and look forward to more.
Excellent review. Exactly how I felt about this wonderful novel and its very likeable, characters. I like this duelling review thing too, however, I feel that Jeff’s “review” went more along the lines of how *he* would have preferred the novel had been written.